As Chasidism so Christian witness

The terrorist targeting of the sole Jewish center in Mumbai India has been particularly rattling. This is what human beings driven by religious fanaticism are capable of.

Enough of that. Two of the five (six?) Jewish people murdered at Chabad House Mumbai were the rabbi and his wife. (I recall when a Chabad House was started in ithaca New York. I also dimly remember an article on this in a local newspaper and what the rebbetzin – rabbi’s wife – had to say about cheeseburgers.) David Klinghoffer writes poignantly about his own appreciation for the Chabad movement.

In which I came across this:

Though their work entails outreach to Jews who haven’t yet been fully acquainted with their spiritual heritage, being judgmental is foreign to Chabad. That’s on principle. In the Tanya (1796), the fundamental work of Chabad philosophy, Chabad founder Schneur Zalman of Liadi urges that alienated and unlettered Jews be drawn in with “strong cords of love.” The Tanya is not worried about whether, in the process, the non-observant Jew actually turns fully to observance.

I thought “what a wonderful description of what Christian witness should look like”. Imagine:

Being judgmental is foreign to Christianity. That’s on principle. Christian theology urges that those alienated from the Christian church and those who have never learned about Jesus be drawn in with strong cords of love. Christian mission is not worried about whether, in the process, the non-practicing Christian or the non-Christian actually turns fully to faith in Christ.

I can live with that.

This entry was posted in Judaism, Media, Missiology, News. Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://www.tikesbestfriend.wordpress.com Tim Dahl

    My Calvinistic side says, “Yes! I agree.” But, my Armenian side says, “but what happens to those that say no?”

    What do we do with “lostness?” Does it matter?

    If I choose to be evangelical, then it has to…in my opinion. Else, there is little need to evangelize. But, if not… *shrug* What do you think? What do we do with the concept of “lostness?”

    Tim

  • http://www.livethetrinity.net Rick

    Hi Tim! Thanks for registering and for leaving a thoughtful comment.

    I think “lostness” (not believing in/following Jesus Christ the son of God) does matter. Recall an interesting exchange at Baptistlife.com about whether one needs to believe in “eternal conscious torment in hell” in order to evangelize. Some of our more conservative friends (to my mild surprise) said “no” (although they did not deny traditional ideas about hell either). Focusing on the transforming power of God through Christ.

    Eternal life begins during this life and continue in the “age to come”. That is one reason to evangelize. Another (one increasingly important to me) is inviting people into the kingdom of God (which I characterize as God’s revolution of forgiveness and compassionate justice).

    By “not worry” I think I mean… I *care* but if people never respond by believing in Christ… we still welcome, befriend, help, share, and celebrate their presence among us.

    Don’t know if that makes any sense.

  • http://www.tikesbestfriend.wordpress.com Tim Dahl

    I’ve been around a couple of guys that no longer use the word “evangelize” all that often. Mainly due to their understanding of the word being different from what others think. Instead, they say their jobs is to make disciples. They offer the opportunity for people to journey through this life with them as they attempt to follow Jesus. They believe that following Jesus is a better experience than anything the world can offer. They believe that after a period of time, those people will stop following them (as they follow Christ), and just follow Jesus instead.

    That was a poor description, but I’m tired. :) Perhaps I’ll try to clarify later…perhaps not.

    I think the core is following Jesus. Whether people say a particular baptistic “sinners” prayer is irrelevant. It is about following Jesus.

    Tim