<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jon Stewart tries to have it both ways (or) court-jester turned cheerleader-clown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://livethetrinity.net/2009/03/jon-stewart-tries-to-have-it-both-ways-at-the-expense-of-truth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://livethetrinity.net/2009/03/jon-stewart-tries-to-have-it-both-ways-at-the-expense-of-truth/</link>
	<description>Questions about life, the universe, everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://livethetrinity.net/2009/03/jon-stewart-tries-to-have-it-both-ways-at-the-expense-of-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livethetrinity.net/?p=419#comment-62</guid>
		<description>My friend Dr Chris Brady kindly refers to my post about Jon Stewart. Two persons left (excellent and reasonable) comments expressing their disagreement. I am not responding to them there because I don&#039;t feel like I should take their disagreement with *me* (and Chris but keep reading) over *there*.

1) As for Chris&#039; excellent reply - what he said.

2) Point of clarification. I am not a Jim Cramer fan. I don&#039;t watch his show for the simple reasons that (a) I don&#039;t have enough money to play the stock market (b) I can&#039;t handle the &quot;manic&quot; manner of the show (especially the camera angle swooping all over the place). I admit that I have tuned in a few times lately out of curiosity.

3) It seems to me that there is one important point that the Mainstream Media (who have been playing this up - fair enough I suppose although they are propping up Stewart at the expense of Cramer) is not addressing. *Why* did Jon Stewart decide to go after CNBC (in general and then Cramer in particular)? Since when did he give a flip? Answer - when someone criticized Team Obama&#039;s economic strategy (or lack thereof).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend Dr Chris Brady kindly refers to my post about Jon Stewart. Two persons left (excellent and reasonable) comments expressing their disagreement. I am not responding to them there because I don&#8217;t feel like I should take their disagreement with *me* (and Chris but keep reading) over *there*.</p>
<p>1) As for Chris&#8217; excellent reply &#8211; what he said.</p>
<p>2) Point of clarification. I am not a Jim Cramer fan. I don&#8217;t watch his show for the simple reasons that (a) I don&#8217;t have enough money to play the stock market (b) I can&#8217;t handle the &#8220;manic&#8221; manner of the show (especially the camera angle swooping all over the place). I admit that I have tuned in a few times lately out of curiosity.</p>
<p>3) It seems to me that there is one important point that the Mainstream Media (who have been playing this up &#8211; fair enough I suppose although they are propping up Stewart at the expense of Cramer) is not addressing. *Why* did Jon Stewart decide to go after CNBC (in general and then Cramer in particular)? Since when did he give a flip? Answer &#8211; when someone criticized Team Obama&#8217;s economic strategy (or lack thereof).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Stewart is doing it again &#8211; Targuman</title>
		<link>http://livethetrinity.net/2009/03/jon-stewart-tries-to-have-it-both-ways-at-the-expense-of-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Stewart is doing it again &#8211; Targuman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 03:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://livethetrinity.net/?p=419#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] Jon Stewart tries to have it both ways (or) court-jester turned cheerleader-clown at Live the Trinit.... [Jon Stewart] is trying to have it both ways as usual. “Put entertainment over journalism”. Excuse me - are we to understand that Jon Stewart is a journalist? That the purpose of “The Daily Show” is journalism? (And in what sense is Jim Cramer trying to be a journalist whatever that means in this context?) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jon Stewart tries to have it both ways (or) court-jester turned cheerleader-clown at Live the Trinit&#8230;. [Jon Stewart] is trying to have it both ways as usual. “Put entertainment over journalism”. Excuse me &#8211; are we to understand that Jon Stewart is a journalist? That the purpose of “The Daily Show” is journalism? (And in what sense is Jim Cramer trying to be a journalist whatever that means in this context?) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

