Archive for June, 2009

Metropolitan Jonah and Anglicanism as Western Orthodoxy redux

Monday, June 29th, 2009

One of my very first posts on this website was about Anglican Christianity as Western Orthodoxy. That is – if Anglican Christianity either reinvents or rediscovers itself as Western Orthodoxy – as a Western expression of Orthodox Christianity. One does not necessarily need to convert to Orthodox Christianity in order to appreciate that Orthodoxy offers much to Protestant Christianity. Indeed I would argue that Orthodoxy may offer solutions to the many problems which threaten Protestant Christianity – which I would argue is in serious danger of becoming a failed experiment.

Enter Metropolitan Jonah and his presentation before the Anglican Communion of North America 2009 on June 26 – just three days ago.

H/T Fr Cantrell at Apostolicity.

George Will – concern for the environment also needs good science and economics

Monday, June 29th, 2009

My daughter is an “environmentalist wacko”.

I do not mean this as an insult. What I find fascinating is to watch my children form strong and passionate opinions that – to the best of my knowledge – are their own. Do I have some influence on them? Sure. But ultimately they are free to agree or disagree with what we pass on to them.

My daughter is much more passionate about environmental concerns than even I am. She appears to agree fully with the whole “global climate change caused by human activity” line – which I am willing to accept but am increasingly concerned that government efforts to combat “global climate change” have much more to do with politics than science.

I am the “electricity nazi” of our home. “Turn off lights in rooms you are not using! Do not just turn off electronic devices – unplug them and/or turn off the power strips!” (This actually goes back to when I was in seminary and we were a family of two then three then four living on a very slim income. Every light bulb left on represented another dollar in electricity we could not afford.)

We recycle more than we throw away. I am the fellow who got the church to start recycling – although it is clear the congregation was more than ready for this they just needed someone to get them started. And even if you have doubts about global climate change and the role humanity plays in that – surely we can agree that petroleum and metal are finite resources. Anything that reduces the extent to which we use up these is a good thing. Even if we reach a point where we no longer use gasoline for transportation – we will always need petroleum for plastics. And if we stop using plastics for trivial things like packaging or disposable utensils – we will always need plastics for medical uses.

All that having been said – I am deeply concerned that in the name of protecting the environment there are some who throw good science and economics out the window.

There is in our congregation a young man working on his doctorate in Climatology. I asked him about global warming. He made it quite clear that he – along with his professors and classmates – do not accept the alleged “consensus” on human-caused global warming. “It is all about politics” he explained.

George Will points out some of the follies of proposed government action in order to deal with “global climate change”.

The Spanish professor is puzzled. Why, Gabriel Calzada wonders, is the U.S. president recommending that America emulate the Spanish model for creating “green jobs” in “alternative energy” even though Spain’s unemployment rate is 18.1 percent — more than double the European Union average — partly because of spending on such jobs?

Calzada, 36, an economics professor at Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, has produced a report which, if true, is inconvenient for the Obama administration’s green agenda, and for some budget assumptions that are dependent upon it.

Read the whole thing here. You do not have to register.

In a nutshell – the Obama Administration’s rhetoric about stimulus spending on “green” jobs does not hold up to scutiny. It could in fact result in a net loss of jobs. Create ten thousand “green” jobs – and thereby lose twenty or thirty thousand jobs elsewhere.

Look – should we develop alternative source of energy? (Energy that does not depend on petroleum or coal.) Of course. (My family was one of the first and few to have solar heating way back in the late 1970’s.) I would love to drive a hybrid – if I could afford one.

But let us not pretend that (a) tens or hundred of billions of dollars in deficit spending along with (b) tens of hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxes on business and consumers – is somehow going to create jobs and economic prosperity.

It may in fact cost jobs and cripple the economy right when it is struggling to recover.

What troubles me about politics and popular culture during the Obama Administration is this – this apparent drive to put (ostensible) good intentions above evidence-and-reason. It is not virtuous to wreck a nation when you claim you are trying to save it.

Additional final note – This has been an extremely busy summer. I have been traveling about every other week (meetings and conferences as well as a family holiday). That is why I am not posting very much. Not to mention I am becoming increasingly sick of the whole “the internet is taking over our lives – blogs and facebook and so on”.

I have several ideas for posts – but am short on time and energy at the moment. Especially a series of posts on the theology of the writings of Tolkien.

'Twould appear conservative lesbians are more common than leprechauns

Tuesday, June 16th, 2009

I stand corrected. Very corrected.

Several weeks ago I wrote a short post expressing appreciation for gay conservatives. What I did not write but was thinking was “so why can one find gay conservatives but apparently not conservative lesbians?”

Well – thank goodness for the Gay Patriot who demonstrated my ignorance. He directs our attention to a post on the blog of Cynthia Yockey a “newly conservative lesbian”. She has a sharp mind and is a strong dynamic writer. Good stuff. And I love the graphic she uses in her header – although I have been spectacularly unable to show it here.

Intellectual honesty and courage.
Pass It Along.

Growing urban-rural tension (or) Random thoughts from trip to Branson

Saturday, June 13th, 2009

My wife threatened to tell everyone at the church that “my husband has gone country”.

Nooooooo!

Well – sort of. There is a serious point coming. See below.

Got back last night – whole trip back on one day – from our first purely fun family holiday and to Branson Missouri. We had a fantastic time. One performer (showboat) described Branson as being “like Mayberry – except with a cover charge”.

I had never had any interest in going to Branson. Sounded like some over-commercialized country music drag strip. I have not cared for country music. Or crowded places. Or spending lots of money. Or heavy traffic.

There is a place in Harrison Arkansas you must stop at whether it is time for lunch/dinner or not. Their slogan is “we knead your dough”. Har har. No seriously. Fantastic food. Good prices. Killer muffins. Had Asiago Cheese Bisque on way up there and Five Star Mushroom on the way back. Yummy soup with two pieces of bread for about $4. Booyah.

Dinner first day at Ruby Tuesday’s. Why do I keep ordering big calorie laden burgers? Why?!? Excellent service. Worth paying $2 to watch my kids have a blast playing “Guitar Hero” at arcade. Strange that I should learn to enjoy KISS songs so late in life.

First night the show was New Shanghai Circus. Very good. Performers looked rather uncomfortable afterwards standing around for autographs and pictures. Apparently ta-men bu hui shuo ying-wen hao (they do not speak English well). Exchanged a few words in zhong-guo-hua with a young man. For some reason I enjoyed the drums most. Most people in the audience liked that the least.

Second day rode the “Ducks” (amphibious vehicles from World War Two) after first moving to our new place at Wyndham Resorts. (Family in church graciously let us use their unused timeshare points. In fact this is why we made the trip on short notice – free accommodations for four nights.) Thought $17 was too much for a one hour ride. No – it was a blast and lasted 1 1/2 hours. Well worth it. Make sure Bubba is your driver/guide or it ain’t worth going.

Second evening dinner at Danna’s. Eat there. Do not fail. Great food at reasonable prices. Pulled pork. No it was not kosher but it was yummy.

Next night saw Shoji Tabuchi. If you visit Branson – see it. Do not fail. It was outstanding. Very professional. Very entertaining. Bought some Japanese chopsticks in the gift shop because they are the best. Even Chinese people prefer them. Bring cash. Loved the drums.

One thought crossed my mind. Shoji learned to love country music while in Japan. And eventually became an American citizen. Everyone cheered. “What a great guy! He became a citizen of this great country!” How often do Americans become citizens of other nations? Would we cheer or label that person a feckless traitor? Imagine how difficult it would be for someone like me to become a citizen of the People’s Republic of China. We cheer when others do what we cannot imagine ourselves doing.

The segment in which he honored his son (who died age 19) and was for anyone who has “lost someone close to your heart” was touching and interesting. (Except for that wretched “If I Could Only Imagine” song.) Last year Jay Hogewood and I led a Jahrzeit worship gathering – one of the most significant things we have done here I think. It is important to acknowledge publicly death and loss and grief in ways that are appropriate and constructive.

Next day spent at Silver Dollar City. We got in for free. How? Some guy with season tickets had four unused guess tickets… waited for a family of four to show up… collared us (thought he might be a scalper)… offered us the four tickets. We saved $200. Then promptly waste(?) $60 on fast-passes (skip line at most popular rides) which we basically did not need or use. Had a great time. Enjoyed the toboggan ride (water slide in a raft) the most and did that about five times. Almost never a long line. I chickened out and would not go on the Powderkeg. (Zero to sixty in two seconds followed by… it looked absolutely freaking terrifying.) Wish I had gone for it just to show I could. Next time make sure you do the cave before you get too tired in the day. I would love to see some caverns.

No show that evening. Luigi’s Pizza for dinner. Excellent.

Last day we road the go-carts. This was the only “bad” experience of the trip. Basically not worth the money. Almost ten dollars per five minute ride on the track. You have got to be kidding me. We spent forty bucks and got the heck out of there.

Last night we were on the “Branson Belle” showboat. Fun performances. Excellent service. Dreadful food – do note! Severe stomach problems meant multiple trips to restroom and even missed some of the featured show by nationally known (animal) ventriloquist. Twenty nine Broadway songs in ten minutes with about as many costume changes was spectacular.

The one thing that was a bit hard to take was the “faith and freedom” schtick at the end. Complete with “Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory” and pictures of an American flag waving next to a cross. Eegads. A bit much. And there was an Orthodox Jewish family a few rows in front of me. (Yes it was that obvious.) Do they have to club us over the head with God and Jesus and the American Flag?!?

A few general observations.

Service and hospitality are always exceptional in Branson. I wish it was like that in other places. We have had some royally bad restaurant experiences – including one in which after one hour we still did not have our food and not only did we leave we refused coupons for free meals from the manager. But in Branson they do everything in their power to take care of you and with a friendly attitude. Even when they “scold” you – like a ride operator explaining to a small boy why he should not unhook the safety bar of his flying chair before the ride is over I am not making that up – they do so politely and respectfully.

Good service means good tips and returning customers. They get that in Branson.

They did not jack up prices even though they could have. Meals in Branson are pretty much what meals cost anywhere else.

But at the same time they used every opportunity they had to encourage a few more dollars our of their guests. I was not offended but you start to roll your eyes after a while. Make sure you visit the gift shop! Twenty dollars for the picture of your family getting onto the boat! Fifteen percent is appreciated! Buy a compact disc or video disc before you leave!

Branson is extremely family friendly and family oriented. You can take your kids to pretty much everything and not worry about “adult” or off-color humor. In fact they make a point of this. “We believe in wholesome entertainment” is a direct quote from one master-of-ceremonies. I happen to appreciate this point and think Hollywood and New York City and Popular Culture in general should sit up and take note. Much of what passes for “entertainment” on the television less so the radio less so the movies is vulgar trash that more or less insults “middle America” its lifestyle and its values.

A few more specific observations

Branson is very very country. That does not mean people who are not country music fans cannot find fun things to see and do. But dang is it country. Hardly a drop of urban(e) sophistication to be found anywhere. Finding a bookstore took some effort.

I wonder if you could have rock shows or classical music or opera or “high” theater (stage drama) in Branson.

I admit being an elite snob in this respect. I sometimes looked around a souvenir shop and thought “what a bunch of tasteless kitsch”. Or looked at other visitors and – unfortunately – thought to myself “what a bunch of hicks from the sticks”.

Branson is also very very white. I did not say racist. What I mean is that you see predominantly white  people in Branson as workers and as visitors. Although a fair number of Hispanics/Latinos which is interesting. Few African-American people. Sometimes I was worried and wondered if people of color would not be comfortable there. But I think it has to do more with the “culture” (types of musical and other offerings) in Branson.

(Last night during the Country Music Awards my children came to get me all excited because there was an African-American country singer on at the moment. He was excellent and we were thrilled to see that.)

Some will find this next part a bit offensive.

Americans are fat. Not everyone. But when you go to the water park and see people in their bathing suits or go to the amusement park and see all these people walking around – some riding around because they are so ginormous they can barely walk – you think “good night people – what do you eat?!? do you ever exercise?!?” Are we an overfed nation? Do we eat more than we need? Do we eat just to have something to do?

And yes I could stand to lose a few myself.

But that also led me to think about nakedness and sex and desire between people – in a positive way. “No I may not be super handsome and yeah maybe I could stand to lose a few and I am pasty white but still you love me and want me just the way I am” is part of the purpose of marriage. Donald Miller nailed the significance of nakedness in his book {NEED REFERENCE}. It is also why pornography is so pernicious and destructive – it is not just about “sin” or “sex is dirty”. It is quintessentially anti-Trinitarian.

What does Branson suggest about American society and culture – and about the emerging urban-rural tension?

I am increasingly convinced that American society may be entering a period of increased civil tension.

Have you seen the map of the 2008 Presidential election results by county? The nation – geographically speaking – is mostly red for Republican. The blue for Democrat counties are primarily in urban areas. (Please do not assume I mean Republican-good and Democrat-bad although I confess favoring Republican at this point in time.)

2008 Presidential election results by county

2008 Presidential election results by county

Not a black-white thing. Not a North-South thing. Although there is a black-white dimension and a North-South dimension.

I am convinced that right now the American people are increasingly divided along urban-rural lines. City versus country.

And the lifestyles and values that – for reasons I do not really understand – seem to go with that.

And where does Popular Culture – television and popular music and movies – come from primarily? From the cities. From urban culture. When people like David Letterman or Katie Couric or Jon Stewart take shot after shot against (political or social) conservative figures – they reflect the urban culture of which they are a part.

See – when you listen to country music it generally reflects a different way of looking at the world and at life. God. Country. Family. Work. Money. And so on.

And Branson is very country. Almost single show and tour at some point made a big deal about honoring veterans – quite astonishing. (New Shanghai Circus was an obvious exception.) And most shows and places to visit at some point make reference to “faith” (unfortunately to faith of a particularly Protestant Christian variety).

I do not think African-American people are so missing from Branson because of their ethnicity. I think it has to do with the extent to which African-Americans may be part of “urban” culture.

Let me explain that a bit. My second year at Cornell University I lived in a special dorm called Ujamaa. About 130+ people. And I was one of three white people.

White students sometimes expressed surprise that I lived there. “You live in the black dorm? Did they make a mistake?” First of all no mistake – you have to apply to live there. I chose to live there and generally enjoyed it and learned a great deal.

Second – and more importantly – although about 95+% African-American I honestly did not think “black dorm” was as accurate as “the New York City dorm”. What gave Ujamaa its peculiar culture was not – in my opinion – the ethnicity of its residents. It was that most of them were from New York City.

I sincerely believe that two New York City people – one white and one African-American – will have more in common than two African-Americans – one from the city and one from the country. Some will say that is nuts. I could be wrong. But so far that is what I have observed.

I am on thin ice here. Because biblically speaking cities have a special significance. How often does the Bible refer to cities in a positive way? More than you might think. See Culture Making by Andy Crouch. Cities are especially important as places where culture is generated.

I am not entirely comfortable with these thoughts and observations. Because it sounds as if I am arguing “city bad – country good”. Cities are supposed to be holy and dynamic places where the kingdom of God happens in high gear. It troubles me deeply to think that in the year 2009 in the United States we have a growing conflict/tension between urban and rural. And urban is winning – largely because that is where much of our news and popular culture come from.

I could be wrong. What do you think?

REVIEW – "Up"

Saturday, June 6th, 2009

I thought “The Incredibles” was simply the most perfect brilliant film Pixar has produced.

Somehow they managed to move the bar even higher. Or should we say deeper.

I thought it was exceptional. Alternating between touching and funny, exhiliterating and profound. The opening ten minutes – which lead to the “present” in which most of the film takes place – is almost unmatched for its beauty and emotional depth.

And no one says anything.

This is particularly important when you are watching the movie with two Americans on your left and two Chinese visiting scholars on your right. The ones on the right might not understand every word – in movies by and for native English speakers the dialogue is fast and full of colloquialisms. And so to convey a story visually – one notices that.

How much can a movie convey without the burden of excessive dialogue or overwhelming music. One thing I have noticed about many American films is how much they employ the soundtrack to tell you what you should be feeling. Cue those violins! Blare those trumpets! Pound those drums! Be sad! Be thrilled! Be frightened!

Which is not to deny that “Up” does incorporate music – and very well. The gentle piano tune that runs through most of the film. But I do not think it is the music itself that says “feel this way now” as much as it helps unite certain thematic elements and parts of the story.

The visuals – especially once the movie is in South America – are remarkable. And the small touches – such as when at last the house drifts off… into the clouds. Nice touch.

There is more meaning and thought in the movie than one can describe. How many issues and questions and situations in life does the film explore? Love. Friendship. Adventure. Dreams. Fame. Honor. Shame. Status. Power. Death. Age. Youth. Family. Parents. Marriage. Childlessness. Disappointment. Loss. Attachment. Freedom… one hardly knows where to stop. There is a tremendous amount of thought in the film. Like the finest of novels that grow gradually and out of years of wisdom and experience.

And yet part of the brilliance of the film – and this I want to emphasize – is that it does not club you over the head with these things. The characters do not sit around talking about aging and dying and grief and so on. The story… happens. And in the story with its characters (of course) the meaning is there for us to consider and explore.

And the small funny touches. I admire and appreciate details. Like the dogs. We have a dog. We love our dog very much. And the dogs in the movie… that is just what dogs are like. Squirrel! I hate squirrels! We can make our dog want to go outside (usually) just by saying “Skippy – get the squirrel!”

The voice of alpha dog. The chatter between the pilots when they first attack the house. (Very nice touch. Very nice indeed.) I thought the whole dining scene was hysterial. “Nice choice” and then they open and pour – and drop – the bottle. Carl’s beard.

And yes there is theology – there is the “gospel” – in this movie. But let me come back to that later. We leave for our first real family holiday (no funerals family or conferences) tomorrow. And I am not taking my computer.

You did notice that last sentence right?

A few last comments.

When I first saw the trailers for “Up” I thought “This looks stupid. Oh please I do not want Pixar to churn out a turkey. A flying house?!? You gotta be kidding me”. Nearly everyone I know who has seen the movie says the same thing. Indeed – look at the movie posters. How much do they tell you? (This issue will be raised in English Conversation next June 12 – a lesson that focuses on movie reviews.)

That is why I chose the poster above rather than the more popular one with Russell and Carl. Just a house floating through the skies.

I have seen many movies by Hiyao Miyazaki. And this one might reflect some influence(?) more than any other Pixar movie I have seen. How many Miyazaki films take place largely in the air (or sky)? And what does that mean?

Extremely funny comic for the few computer geeks who will get it

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

Was perusing my latest issue of LINUX Journal – to which I subscribe so should you! – and came across this cartoon. Some computer geeks will get it. I thought it very funny and laughed out loud.

Irony – thy name is "Episcopal"

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

Frankly I have not paid much attention to this because I do not care an whole lot.

The Rev. Alberto Cutié, the celebrity priest removed from his Miami Beach church after photos of him kissing and embracing a woman appeared in the pages of a Spanish-language magazine earlier this month, has left the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Miami to join the Episcopal church and announced that he will marry the woman he has dated for two years.

Read the whole thing at Miam Herald. You do not have to register.

You may not have followed this closely but perhaps you heard about this. The paragraph above is remarkably well written – good journalism if nothing else – because in just a couple sentences you get the picture. (I taught writing to university students for about a year. I try to recognize and acknowledge when people write well.) Catholic priest has relationship with woman. Comes to public light. Catholic priest leaves Catholic church – or does he? therein lies a rub – and joins Episcopal Church.

I have no interest in criticizing or judging Father Alberto Cutie. Really. Yeah he broke his vows. Yeah he should not have been doing that while a Catholic priest. But celibacy has got to be tough. Especially when you meet a woman you really like. Should he have left the Catholic church before pursuing this relationship? Yeah probably. But think about the practicality of that. (Counterargument below – he may have made his vows of celibacy while in this relationship. But set that aside for a moment.) If you want to leave the Catholic church in order to pursue a relationship with a woman…

Think about it. How can you even consider leaving (the “honorable” thing to do) before you have already started down that road? And are you really going to leave all that behind when you have been “dating”? One cannot terribly blame a fellow for pursuing that relationship to some extent before saying “oh man – I cannot keep doing this and remain a Catholic priest”.

Anyways. That is not what this post is about.

This post is about the Episcopal Church. And how Episcopal bishop Leo Frade of Southeast Florida has handled the matter.

“Well. What a great opportunity to kick the Catholic Church in the nuts”.

There is a certain diseased cynicism in immediately and publicly saying “Well – we would love to have this guy come join the Episcopal church. Our church allows clergy to get some”. Rank self-serving opportunism.

One wise parish priest in Baton Rouge summarized the problem in the Episcopal Church this way. “They have turned pastoral theology into dogma”.

But one wonders if this is even pastoral theology. Certainly not very pastoral toward the Catholic church or those whom Father Curie served. The reporter nails it with more good journalism:

At a press conference late Thursday afternoon, Archdiocese of Miami officials expressed disappointment in Cutié and had strong words for the Episcopal Church, especially Bishop Frade.

”This is truly a setback for ecunemical relations and cooperation between us. The Archdiocese have never made a public display when for doctrinal reasons Episcopal priests have joined the Catholic Church and sought ordination,” said Archbishop John Favalora. He said he had not heard from Frade about the transition and had not spoken to Cutié since May 5, adding that Cutié never told the archbishop he wanted to get married.

Great quote. “We don’t made a big public display when your guys join us. But when one of us joins you… you rub our faces in it”. Favalora is a real Christian bishop who refrains from calling Bishop Frade… a jerk.

But one more point. And I posted this over at Midwest Conservative Journal (which I no longer visit much – just interested in other issues right now):

“Not so, Bishop Frade said Thursday afternoon. ‘That promise [his vow of celibacy] is not recognized by our church. If you can find it in the Bible that priests should be celibate, that will be corrected,’ Frade said.”

Oh the rich irony.

Person A leaves Church C and joins Church E. Church C says “Person A is still bound by the rules of Church C to which he agreed”. Church E says “Rubbish – we do not recognize that prior commitment within Church C”.

And invokes the Bible while they are at it. (Fair enough.)

This is the rhetoric when:

A = guy who likes women (fair enough I suppose)
C = Catholic Church
E = Episcopal Church

Ah… but when:

A = a congregation or bishop committed to traditional Anglicanism
C = *Episcopal Church*
E = *Anglican Church* (or a diocese/province committed to traditional Anglicanism)

Then the rhetoric changes dramatically.

“Bishop/Congregation A is still bound by the rules of Church C [here C = Episcopal] to which he/they agreed. And we do not care what the Bible says on this matter. All your parish property is now belong to us. See you in court”.

Wow.

The gift of the unexpected (or) Trip back from Los Angeles

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009

What a truly great trip back from Los Angeles. There is a theological point lurking here.

Preface. I am an introvert. Tend to sit by myself. Not usually the one to say to a stranger “can I sit here?” and strike up a conversation. Others generously did that for me at ACMI 2009 – and they were great gifts. Glory to God for brave and generous people who sit with strangers!

/end preface

Heading back to airport in a van. Huge line on the sidewalk and I comment how much I hate lines. Someone in the van says “use that time to meet people and talk with them”. But do not sometimes people feel like “leave me alone” or even “who are you and what do you want?” Why – I am supposed to share with you the good news of Jesus Christ! Right? Oh man.

Well – I tried to be more extrovert and social than usual.

Talk to a woman and her husband in security line. Talk to two women (this is when I feel particularly weird) behind me. My turn for the ATS agent and I say “oh look at that beautiful smile – you just made my day”.

Call Jean to see how the treatments are going.

On the plane – shall I talk to the young woman on my left or the older gentleman on my right? Had 3 hours of sleep so not feeling so hot myself. “What are you reading?” And the gentleman… well that was the beginning of a 3 hour conversation. About religion. Politics. Language. Movies. You name it.

It was clear in 3 minutes he thinks religion is a dangerous harmful thing. The book is about notorious murders by people who thought God was telling them to kill this or that person. I decide to listen. No arguing or trying to convince or convert. A couple times I press back with why I believe this or that (and in response to his asking). And he presses right back with “see – that is a cheat… you bring down the universe… you anthropomorphize… you insult existence”. All very pleasant and with a smile.

And he clearly is more to the left than me on political issues. He is quite angry about conservative opposition to Sotomayor. Very strongly supports labor unions and protectionism. And it is all Nixon’s fault – ultimately. Although he – like me – is a libertarian (albeit leaning slightly statist on business and economy) and we find some common ground. But I listen occasionally nod “unh hunh” and try to understand.

It was a delightful interesting engaging conversation. I am glad he challenged me – hard – on some of my views. Specific example – “why does the universe need human beings to take care of it [my exegesis of Genesis 1-2 well sort of]? would not the planet be a paradise without human beings?” That is a very fine point that deserves an answer (which I think I have but did not want to argue).

He says “you are the most interesting person I have ever sat next to on an airplane”. (Oh please. Surely not.) Asks me to pray for him this weekend. Gives me his email address so I can check on him afterwards.

I no longer like to fly. The 3 hour flight passed quickly and was a joy. “What are you reading?” It was the gift of an unexpected conversation.

Quick layover in Houston then board flight to Baton Rouge. My brother calls – did not see that coming. They just saw “Star Trek” and we talk about the original series and Captain Pike and delta rays and mirror universe and Pixar films. And his daughter and my kids and so on. The gift of an unexpected conversation.

Sit next to middle aged gentleman who looks to be from India with his wife – who sits several rows up. I offer to switch so they can sit together. Then I realize “wait – as if I do not want to sit with him?” and let it drop.

Apparently I know him. Sort of. His wife works at University Baptist Church. Other members of the family whom I know personally also work at the church. (Child development center or weekend childcare – I do not see them regularly.) He is from Bangladesh and I learn a great deal about the history of that nation its challenges and relationship with other countries. Oh – and the family he is visiting lives in an apartment complex I know intimately. Some of our people live there and the church bus stops there every Friday night and Sunday morning.

“On your way home from a trip?” The gift of an unexpected conversation.

So this is what happens when the introvert – carefully and prudently one hopes – cracks open the shell just a bit. Takes a risk. And talks to a stranger.

Oh – and one more thing.

Louisiana people.

I love Louisiana people. Louisiana people waiting for a plane – I mean if the flight is to Baton Rouge we must be from there because who on earth travels to Baton Rouge? We laugh and talk and chat together – like we are old friends and neighbors. San Diego marathon. She hates to fly. Get off the plane and everyone is smiling and kind and generous to each other. “No after you. I will take the next elevator”. I have seen it on flights to New Orleans as well. Talking with people at ACMI I shared it several times how Louisiana people are warm friendly generous and very social. You do not see the same usual? (really? can one prove this by comparing to flights to other cities and states?) stony silence between strangers.

Oh yeah Louisiana got its share of problems too. But we really are like that – am I right?